
UNIVERSITIES AS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
Funded by


About us
the aim of this project is to generate a bottom-up understanding of what a sustainable university community may look like, but also to generate knowledge that can be applied into practice. Such knowledge can prompt transformative practices in the university community to consider more African/Indigenous/locally-centred strategies, not necessarily as a unique vision but rather as an articulation of an ecology of knowledges.
Hence, the project is not only relevant and necessary due to current claims for decolonisation in the South African higher education sector but also as a way to align aims and methodological procedures within our research practices. In this participatory research project power is shared among facilitators and research partners (student activists). This shifts knowledge asymmetries placing at the centre students’ voices, knowledges, and valued ways of being.
Our Project
Universities in South Africa present a complex context due to Apartheid legacies and persistent inequalities; hence, transforming universities into more sustainable, decolonial and African-centred communities of higher learning continues to be a key imperative, as highlighted in the White Paper. Although much has been done at the policy level and through research, students generally, and activist students, more particularly, are usually left behind throughout these research and policy development processes. However, their experiences, knowledge, African and Indigenous values and cosmovisions should be at the centre of sustainability initiatives, as a counterpoint to current university structures based on Eurocentric values, competitive logics and policies external to local values held by the communities universities seek to serve. Therefore, the centrality of student activism is not only critical to bring knowledge from below which is rooted on resistances against hegemonic and dehumanising forces, but also as a decolonial strategy that aims to genuinely acknowledge African/Indigenous/locally-rooted knowledges and worldviews to conceptualise what education for sustainable development is and how it is envisaged in this context.
​
That is why, in our project we combine decolonial thinking and the capabilities approach to challenge epistemic injustices that limit students’ voices from being acknowledged in conceptualising what a sustainable university community is in a Global South context. We therefore aim to foreground students’ valued ways of living and being through a process of participatory storytelling.
Using participatory storytelling we are co-creating knowledge on what it means and what it takes to build sustainable communities in the context of one historically white South Africa University (The University of the Free State, UFS). Although the project focuses on one university, the findings will yield data that can inform debates and conversations on educational development and sustainability in the higher education space, through academic and non-academic publications and engagement strategies that will expand the reach of our findings to other students and student activists across the country, and to other stakeholders.
The research design of this study aligns with our theoretical positionality under a decolonial lens and capabilities approach perspective. We situate the research under a participatory paradigm (Heron & Reason, 1997) to reclaim the need to reshape research positionalities between researchers and participants to foster epistemic freedoms (Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2018, Fricker, 2015). Hence, the project is based on establishing long-term partnerships with leaders and members of different student organisations forming a dynamic, interdisciplinary and diverse research team, where all participants of the project are co-researchers.

Our main aim is
To co-develop a conceptualisation of a sustainable university community that will inform an action plan for an African/Indigenous/locally-centred conception of Higher Education for Sustainable Development at the University of the Free State.

Our secondary aims are
-
Co-create an African/Indigenous/locally-rooted conception of a sustainable educational community with student activists prompting ecologies of knowledges that bring insights from diverse stakeholders’ epistemic systems
2. Co-explore student activists’ resistances against oppressions and their analysis of structural factors that impend universities to become more sustainable and just educational communities.
3. Co-create strategies and an action plan for transforming universities into a more African/Indigenous/locally rooted institution.

Our principal Research Question is
How can we co-create and promote an African/Indigenous/locally-centred conceptualisation of a sustainable educational community at the UFS drawing primarily from (but not restricted to) university student activists’ valued ontologies and ways of living that they have reason to pursue?

Our secondary research questions are
Internal Empirical Questions
-
Which ontologies and cosmologies do student activists have reason to value and promote for themselves?
-
Which dimensions are central to these students’ cosmovisions and ontologies to understand sustainable educational development in this particular university context?
-
What is, according to these activist students, a community? And a university community?
-
How do student activists define a more transformed and decolonial education/university community?
-
What do students understand as sustainable education from their different activist groups and resistances against oppressive powers?
-
What is an African/Indigenous/locally-centred sustainable university community according to student activists?
-
What are the human capabilities that student activists have reason to value in relation to developing a sustainable university community?
-
Which capabilities and functionings are considered necessary to promote a more sustainable university community?
-
Which strategies and actions can be taken towards promoting an African-based understanding of a sustainable university community?

External Empirical Questions
-
How can diverse knowledges be deliberated and reconciled (Ecology of knowledges) to enrich an Indigenous/African/Locally-centred sustainable university community (Including TESF Conceptions)?
-
Which black holes and incommensurability arise from this Ecology of knowledges?
-
How can our conception of sustainable university community be re-worked after this ecology of knowledges?

Methodological and Evaluative Questions
-
How can research underpinned by decolonial thinking and participatory strategies expand students’ individual and collective capabilities to be social agents of sustainable development in their own educational institution?
-
How can the strategies and the action plan emerging from this participatory research contribute to a sustainable future at the University of the Free State, if so?
-
Which limitations, challenges and issues have been identified during our participatory project and which lessons can we learn from them?
The Research Process
The research process is divided into six main phases (excluding phase 0 or the pre-implementation phase)
​
-
Phase 0: Pre-implementation, co-design and baselines
Outcome: Oral agreements about our roles and the ethical principles guiding the process.
-
Phase 1: Negotiation and take off
Outcome: Agreed research plan document.
-
Phase 2: Internal exploration and first discussion cycle:
Outcome: Documentation of all our responses to the (internal) empirical research questions
(in different formats e.g. written, oral, visual, and audio recordings)
-
Phase 3: Articulation of ecology of knowledges:
Outcome: Recruitment strategy; a mid-project evaluation report; and one conceptual academic paper
-
Phase 4: Story production
Outcome:12 Stories (One per individual co-researcher/different format) and 1 Participatory Video
(One as a group with co-researcher and facilitators)
-
Phase 5: Dissemination and Action Plan
Outcome: A manifesto for the development of a sustainable university community;
An action plan for the dissemination of the project findings.
-
Phase 6: Final Engagement and Collective Evaluation.
Outcome: Evaluation report based in our reflections on lessons learnt about transforming universities into
sustainable educational communities; a public engagement event.

